Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Ortas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 7, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that it would have been reasonable for claimant to accede to her employer’s request that she get along with her co-workers and reasonable for her to remain on the job. Because we find substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. In re the Claim of ChassmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. In re the Claim of SimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claim for Unemployment Insurance of Weidner v. Life Care Centers of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In re the Claim of SolanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of FerrugiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. In re the Claim of FriedlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API