Legal Opinion
State v. LaRue
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided May 15, 2003No. 09-03-139 CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID B. GAULTNEY, Justice.
Defendant Joe Edward LaRue was indicted for the 1989 murder of Donna Pentecost. Finding the State willfully violated a discovery order, the trial court granted LaRue’s motion to suppress DNA evidence. The State filed this interlocutory appeal of the suppression order.
JURISIDICTION
We have jurisdiction under Tex. Code CRiM. PROC. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (Vernon Supp.2003). The State may appeal a court order granting a motion to suppress evidence if jeopardy has not attached in the case, and if the prosecuting attorney certifies to the trial court that the appeal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Oles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dunklin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
- State v. LaRueCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- LaRue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
- Anthony Deleon, Sr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.