Legal Opinion

Dundee Realty Co. v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1944No. 31578PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Messmore, j.

Plaintiff owned real estate in Omaha which was included by ordinance within a restricted zone for high-type residential use. Plaintiff contends that such inclusion was unreasonable, arbitrary and amounted to the taking of its real estate, or a part thereof, unlawfully. The trial court sustained the ordinance.

In this case there is a stipulation that the trial court, who heard and determined the first action, try the issues involved in this,- the second, action. The transcript sets forth a history of the ordinances involved, their relationship to each other and their effect.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Civello v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  5. City of Aurora v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pierro v. BaxendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. City of Omaha v. GlissmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bowman v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Bucholz v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API