Dundee Realty Co. v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Messmore, j.
Plaintiff owned real estate in Omaha which was included by ordinance within a restricted zone for high-type residential use. Plaintiff contends that such inclusion was unreasonable, arbitrary and amounted to the taking of its real estate, or a part thereof, unlawfully. The trial court sustained the ordinance.
In this case there is a stipulation that the trial court, who heard and determined the first action, try the issues involved in this,- the second, action. The transcript sets forth a history of the ordinances involved, their relationship to each other and their effect.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State ex rel. Civello v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- City of Aurora v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pierro v. BaxendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- City of Omaha v. GlissmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Bowman v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Bucholz v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.