Bucholz v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
This action was brought to declare two zoning ordinances of the city of Omaha, Nebraska, void. The district court declared the ordinances to be void and enjoined the defendants from exercising any rights under them. The defendants’ motion for new trial was overruled and they have appealed to this court.
The assignments of error are that the judgment of the district court is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary to the evidence and the law. It is the duty of this court to. try the issues of fact complained of de novo and reach an independent conclusion without reference to the findings…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pecora v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Baylis v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Hartnett v. AustinSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Houston Petroleum Co. v. Automotive Products Credit Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Pressman v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Myhre v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Chrismon v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Scrutton v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Giger v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.