Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 18, 2002No. 01-345CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILSON, Judge.

Pending before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and plaintiffs Motion to Transfer. At issue is plaintiffs claim for breach of an EEO settlement agreement. Plaintiffs complaint alleges that the Postal Service breached a 1988 settlement agreement by failing to grant plaintiff annual and sick leave, change plaintiffs seniority date and adjust plaintiffs salary, and seeks $200,000 in damages and $50,000 in attorney’s fees. Defendant denies that the settlement agreement was breached and argues that this Court lacks jurisdiction…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Zhengxing v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Munoz v. MabusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Hansson, Marian K. v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Taylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API