Legal Opinion
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Pak China Group Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided February 6, 2012No. Case No. 1:10-CV-24386-JEMPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS PAK CHINA GROUP CO. LTD. AND NEW PAK CHINA TRADE INTERNATIONAL CO.
JOSE E. MARTINEZ, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff TracFone Wireless, Ine.’s (“TracFone”) Motion for Default Judgment against Pak China Group Co. Ltd. (“Pak China”), and New Pak China Trade International Co. (“New Pak China”) (collectively “Defendants”) [D.E. No. 79]. Plaintiffs complaint asserts claims for federal trademark infringement, 15 U.S.C. § 1114; federal unfair competition, 15 U.S.C. § 1125; breach of contract; contributory…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stephen Dye v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Brain Pharma, LLC v. ScaliniDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. v. Grand China Shipping (Hong Kong) Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012
- Technomarine SA v. Jacob Time, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Dye v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.