Legal Opinion
S&L VITAMINS, INC. v. Australian Gold, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2007No. 05-CV-1217 (JS)(MLO)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff S&L Vitamins, Inc. (“S&L Vitamins” or “S&L”) motion for summary judgment and Defendant Australian Gold’s (“AG”) motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons explained below, S&L’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and AG’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On March 4, 2005, S&L Vitamins commenced the instant action seeking a declaratory judgment that its sale of AG’s products did not, inter alia, constitute trademark infringement. AG answered the…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- New World Solutions, Inc. v. NameMedia Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Carson Optical, Inc. v. Prym Consumer USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Reed Construction Data Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.