Hohlenkamp v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
This is the second round in this court for this products liability case involving a water heater. In the case of Hohlenkamp v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, 123 Ariz. 535, 601 P.2d 298 (App.1979), we reversed a summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer.
The trial record shows that in February 1958, Mr. and Mrs. Hohlenkamp purchased and took up residence in their new home in Tucson. It contained a Rheem gas-fired hot water heater which was located in a 6' X 10' utility-storage room along with a washing machine and a furnace. For the four years prior to the fire…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Ault v. International Harvester Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Union Supply Co. v. PustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Dart v. Wiebe Manufacturing, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Readenour v. Marion Power ShovelArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Toups v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.