Legal Opinion
Scinto v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2009No. Civil Action 08-0361 (PLF)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Paul Scinto, Sr. seeks money damages for alleged violations of his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated in various Federal Bureau of Prisons’ (“BOP”) facilities between 2002 and 2007. The matter is currently before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer. After careful consideration of the parties’ arguments, as well as the fact that plaintiff is pro se and that any papers drafted by him must be construed liberally, see, e.g., Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 547 (D.C.Cir.1999), the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Richardson, Roy Dale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Paul Scinto, Sr. v. Warden StansberryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Morrow v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Bond v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Coltrane v. LappinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Tabman v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.