Legal Opinion
Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 27, 2001No. 00-860PublishedCited by 1,784 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
We decide here whether the implied damages action first recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388 (1971), should, be extended to allow recovery against a private corporation operating a halfway house under contract with the Bureau of Prisons. We decline to so extend Bivens.
Petitioner Correctional Services Corporation (CSC), under contract with the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), operates Community Corrections Centers and other facilities that house federal prisoners and detainees.1 Since the late *641980’s, CSC has operated Le Marquis Community Correctional…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,784 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Peter Bistrian v. Troy LeviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
1,779 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.