Legal Opinion
Dumochel v. Becce
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 8, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries received from being run into by a truck owned and operated by the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff which the defend ant moved to set aside. The appeal is from the denial of the motion.
The only questions involved are whether upon the evidence the jury was warranted in finding the defendant negligent and the plaintiff in the exercise of due care. The plaintiff was struck by the truck on South Main Street near the- intersection of South Lounsbury Street in Waterbury on October 3d, 1933, at about six p.m. Taking the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ruerat v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Kotler v. LalleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Weidlich v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Shaughnessy v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Tomasko v. RaucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State v. TomassiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- White v. HerbstSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Esserman v. MaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.