Legal Opinion
State v. Foord
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 18, 1955PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivast, J.
The first count of the information alleges that the defendant William M. Foord violated § 8487 of the General Statutes in that he received a bribe as a member of the General Assembly; the second count alleges that the defendant Clifford B. Baekes violated § 8488 in that he attempted to improperly influence legislation. Each defendant elected trial to the court and each, after full hearing, was found guilty as charged. Both defendants have appealed to this court. Their joint assignments of error are predicated upon the denial of requested changes in the finding, upon the overruling of their…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.