Legal Opinion

Purkey v. Harding

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Beadle County. Hon. Chas. S. Whiting, Judge. Action by J. G. Purkey against T. A. Harding and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, who is appellant, against T. A. Harding et al., defendants, for specific performance of a certain written contract alleged in the complaint to have been executed by Kelley’s Rand Agency, as the duly authorized agent for T. A. Harding, party of the first part, and J. G. Purkey, party of the second part, whereby the defendant Harding purported to sell to plaintiff certain therein prescribed real estate situated in Beadle county on certain therein specified terms and conditions. The. defendant Harding answered, denying that he had ever authorized the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brandrup v. BrittenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Quale v. HazelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Staab v. SkoglundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Haimovitz v. HawkSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Axtell v. MullerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Arnold v. GenzbergerMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Staab v. SkoglundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API