Legal Opinion

Brandrup v. Britten

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Richland County; Lauder, J. Action by J. R. Brandrup against Riley T. Britten. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The plaintiff in this action seeks to compel the defendant to specifically perform a certain written contract alleged to have been executed by the defendant, and by the terms of which defendant agreed to sell and convey to the plaintiff certain real estate, consisting of 640 acres, situate in Richland county. The trial court found that the contract in question was not executed by the defendant, or by his authority, and directed the entry of judgment dismissing the action. Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment, and demands a review of the entire case in this court.

' The facts which are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duffy v. HobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Halsey v. MorteiroSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  3. Glentworth v. LutherNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Armstrong v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Grant v. EdeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rhode v. GallatSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  2. Bacon v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Brown v. GilpinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Tostenson v. IhlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Watters v. DanceySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API