Quale v. Hazel
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Kingsbury county; Hon. Charles S. Whiting, Judge. Action by A. N. Quale against O. H. Hazel. Prom a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.
This is an action by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant the sum of $320, alleged to be due him as commission upon the sale of a half section of land in Kings-bury county. The 'Case was tried to a jury, and, the verdict and judgmént being in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff has appealed.
It is alleged by the plaintiff in his complaint that on the 29th day of January, 1904, this plaintiff and the defendant, by and through his duly authorized agent, H. V. Foxton, entered into a contract by the terms of which it was agreed that this *485plaintiff should procure a purchaser for the half…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shull v. New Birdsall Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. HammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Klaveness v. FreeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Purkey v. HardingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Comeau v. HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Croughan v. GerlachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.