Legal Opinion
Kerrie Milligan-Grimstad v. Morgan Stanley
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 11, 2017No. 16-4224PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Kerrie Milligan 1 alleges that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (“Morgan Stanley”) fired her on the basis of her sex and that it allowed her coworkers to create a hostile work environment. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits both. The district court granted summary judgment in Morgan Stanley’s favor, finding that Morgan Stanley dismissed Milligan for her performance and that the conduct she alleged did not create a hostile work environment. Milligan now appeals. We affirm.
I. Background
This appeal challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Denise Coleman v. Patrick R. DonahoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Ryan Lord v. High Voltage Software, IncorpoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Elizabeth Castro v. DeVry University, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Warren Johnson v. Advocate Health and HospitalsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Vicki Barbera v. Pearson Education, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Brigid Ford v. Marion County Sheriff's OfficCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Timothy Spangler v. Alfred PeralesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Dan Williams v. Board of Education of the CityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.