Legal Opinion

Concerned Pastors for Social Action v. Khouri

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 10, 2016No. Case Number 16-10277PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

David M. Lawson, United States District Judge

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit seek remedial action—both immediate and long-term—to address lead contamination found in Flint’s public water system. Presently before the Court is the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction through which they ask the Court to order the defendants to provide two forms of immediate relief: First, the plaintiffs want the defendants to submit to the Court for review and approval a plan to provide every household served by the Flint water…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Concerned Pastors for Social Action v. KhouriDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  2. Mich. Dep't of Envtl. Quality v. City of FlintDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  3. Boynes v. Limetree Bay Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API