Kerr v. Kingsbury
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent. Foreclosure. Complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The controversy in this case concerns *152certain, buildings which are claimed by complainant under a real estate mortgage given March 13, 1874, by defendant Solomon 0. Kingsbury to their testator. The defendant Lyon, on the other hand, claims them as tenant’s fixtures under a lease of the lands mortgaged.
The facts appear to be that the defendant S. 0. Kingsbury, on the 25th day of January, 1871, being then the owner of certain premises situated on Calder and Almy streets in the city of Grand Bapids, leased the Calder- street lots for ten years from June 1, 1871, to John S. Long and Samuel P.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norris v. DoniphanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
- Loughran v. . RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Bloomer v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Merritt & Bourne v. Judd & ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Adams v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Lewis v. Ocean Navigation & Pier Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- McClintic-Marshall Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Second National Bank of Beloit, Wis. v. O. E. Merrill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.