Legal Opinion

People v. Ash

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 23, 2004No. 4-02-0838PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Appleton

A jury found defendant, Russell S. Ash, guilty of possession of a controlled substance (less than 15 grams) (720 ILCS 570/402(c) (West 2002)). Ash appeals on four grounds: (1) the trial court violated Supreme Court Rule 608(a)(9) (177 Ill. 2d R. 608(a)(9)) and his right to due process by allowing voir dire to proceed off the record; (2) defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance by waiving the reporting of voir dire; (3) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of an uncharged crime, possession of drug paraphernalia (720 ILCS 600/ 3.5(a) (West 2002)); and (4) the evidence was too…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Lane v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Entsminger v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. People v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. HoustonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API