Legal Opinion

Ruehlow v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The facts are few and undisputed. The plaintiff, when twelve years of age, lost the vision of his right eye as a result of a non-industrial accident. On July 6, 1931, at the age of forty years, he lost the vision of his left eye as a result of an industrial accident. There is no question as to his right to recover compensation from his employer for the loss of vision of his left eye.

The question here relates only to the number of weeks of additional compensation the plaintiff should be paid out of the special state fund created by virtue of sub. (6) (a) of sec. 102.09, Stats. 1929…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Millard v. North River InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wisconsin Foundry & Machine Co. v. Capital City Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Broadway-Wisconsin Investment Co. v. Sentinel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mednis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Mednis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API