Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*227The following opinion was filed November 8, 1922:

Eschweiler, J.

Under the situation disclosed by the record and recited above, the motion by respondent plaintiff for a review of portions of the judgment to which it had filed exemptions was too late and cannot be considered.

The right to a review of portions of a judgment by a respondent is granted by the provisions of sec. 3049a, Stats., created by ch. 219, Laws 1915, the material portion whereof is as follows:

“In any case the respondent may have a review of the rulings of which he complains by serving upon the appellant any time before the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Techt v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Birge-Forbes Co. v. HeyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Johnson Coffee Co. v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Pacific Gold Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Belle City Malleable Iron Co. v. RowlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. C. F. Trantow Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Lloyd-McAlpine Logging Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Isaac v. Gerretson Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Stojic v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API