Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*227The following opinion was filed November 8, 1922:
Eschweiler, J.
Under the situation disclosed by the record and recited above, the motion by respondent plaintiff for a review of portions of the judgment to which it had filed exemptions was too late and cannot be considered.
The right to a review of portions of a judgment by a respondent is granted by the provisions of sec. 3049a, Stats., created by ch. 219, Laws 1915, the material portion whereof is as follows:
“In any case the respondent may have a review of the rulings of which he complains by serving upon the appellant any time before the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Techt v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Birge-Forbes Co. v. HeyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Johnson Coffee Co. v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Pacific Gold Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Belle City Malleable Iron Co. v. RowlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- C. F. Trantow Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Lloyd-McAlpine Logging Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Isaac v. Gerretson Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Stojic v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.