Legal Opinion
Mednis v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1965PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The applicant appellant asserts that prior to the industrial injury of December 11, 1961, he had industrial usable vision in his left eye which was completely lost as a result of the injury, and that under the Workmen’s Compensation Act he is entitled to full benefits.
Sec. 102.52, Stats., provides in part:
“Permanent partial disability schedule. In cases included in the following schedule of permanent partial disabilities indemnity shall be paid for the healing period, and in addition thereto, where the employe is 50 years of age or *442less, for the period specified, at the rate of 70 per cent of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trczyniewski v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Giant Grip Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Wisconsin Axle Division v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Borello v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Zimmerman v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Hunker v. Royal Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Cook v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Chevrolet Division, General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.