Legal Opinion

Copar Pumice Company, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 18, 2013No. 12-894LPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fifth Amendment Taking; Breach of Settlement Agreement; Forest Service regulation of pumice mines under the Mining Law, 30 U.S.C. §§ 22-42, Common Varieties Act, 30 U.S.C. § 611 et seq., and Jemez National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460jjj; statute of limitations; collateral estoppel; res judicata; promissory estoppel; unjust enrichment; misrepresentation

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court is a motion to dismiss the present action brought by plain tiffs Copar Pumice Company, Inc. (“Copar”) and Kelly Armstrong (collectively, “plaintiffs”) arising from plaintiffs’ mining…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Vane Minerals (Us), LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Estes Express Lines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Compliance Solutions Occupational Trainers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API