Copar Pumice Company, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Fifth Amendment Taking; Breach of Settlement Agreement; Forest Service regulation of pumice mines under the Mining Law, 30 U.S.C. §§ 22-42, Common Varieties Act, 30 U.S.C. § 611 et seq., and Jemez National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460jjj; statute of limitations; collateral estoppel; res judicata; promissory estoppel; unjust enrichment; misrepresentation
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is a motion to dismiss the present action brought by plain tiffs Copar Pumice Company, Inc. (“Copar”) and Kelly Armstrong (collectively, “plaintiffs”) arising from plaintiffs’ mining…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Vane Minerals (Us), LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Estes Express Lines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Compliance Solutions Occupational Trainers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.