Legal Opinion

Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 23, 2015No. 14-647CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-09; Motion to Dismiss, Rule 12(b)(1); Motion for Summary Judgment, Rule 56; Motion Remand to the Contracting Officer, 41 U.S.C. § 7103(f)(5); Deemed Denial of a Claim.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY, Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. (“R & S”), brought this action pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-09 (“CDA”). The government moved to dismiss R & S’s complaint, or alternatively for summary judgment, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 56 of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Dcx-Chol Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  3. Hydraulics International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Urs Energy & Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API