Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-09; Motion to Dismiss, Rule 12(b)(1); Motion for Summary Judgment, Rule 56; Motion Remand to the Contracting Officer, 41 U.S.C. § 7103(f)(5); Deemed Denial of a Claim.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY, Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. (“R & S”), brought this action pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-09 (“CDA”). The government moved to dismiss R & S’s complaint, or alternatively for summary judgment, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 56 of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Dcx-Chol Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Hydraulics International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Urs Energy & Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016