State v. Williamson

BRASWELL, Judge.

Defendant’s sole question presented for review is whether the court erred in its findings of fact by failing to show that defendant’s evidence of lawful excuse was considered and evaluated.

Some confusion arises from the fact that there are two separate documents —an order and a judgment —which revoke defendant’s probation. Discrepancies, although mostly minor ones, exist in these documents. The major difference is that while the judgment contains the phrase, “From evidence presented, the Court finds . . .”, this language is missing from the order. In his brief, defendant…