Miller v. Preitz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen,
This is an appeal from judgments for defendants entered on their preliminary objections, in the nature of demurrers, to plaintiff-administrator’s complaint.
The following, well pleaded, factual allegations must be taken as true for purposes of ruling on the *386demurrers. On or about October 1, 1961, Gloria Sewell, an aunt and next door neighbor of the infant decedent, Earl Brian Coakley, purchased a vaporizer-humidifier from defendant Wallace Preitz, trading as Hartsville Pharmacy. The device had been manufactured by defendant Northern Electric Company and distributed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Pezzulli v. D'AmbrosiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Hochgertel v. Canada Dry Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.