Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 23, 2014No. Case No. 08-13503PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS MICHCON’S THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST THE UNITED STATES (Dkt. No. 120)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Now before the Court is the United States’ Motion to Dismiss the Third-party Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (“MiehCon”). (Dkt. No. 120). MichCon filed its Response to the United States’ Motion to Dismiss on February 11, 2013. (Dkt. No. 123). The United States filed its Reply on February 21, 2013. (Dkt. No. 124). Plaintiffs Ford Motor Company and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014