Legal Opinion
Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 20, 2018No. Case No. 3:13-cv-115PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER H. RICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant *891Valley Asphalt Corporation's Amended Counterclaim, Doc. # 794, and Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant The Dayton Power & Light Company's Amended Counterclaim, Doc. # 798.
I. Background and Procedural History
Plaintiffs, Hobart Corporation, Kelsey-Hayes Company and NCR Corporation, filed suit against numerous defendants under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. , seeking…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Randall D. Carver v. Bobby Bunch and Betty BunchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Lincoln v. County of PlacerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022