Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Baltz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 28, 2000No. 95,169PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*468ORDER
1 1 Petitioner is in custody pursuant to an order of commitment on a verdict of guilty for indirect contempt of court arising from failure to pay child support. He challenges the order requiring support payments, alleging that he did not receive notice of the hearing on the order, and that the order erroneously determined that he had previously been adjudicated the father of the child involved. The Court need not address the second ground, because the first is sufficient for issuance of a writ requiring Petitioner's release.
T2 Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Habeas…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- In Re PatswaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Heiman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Matter of Estate of SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Brady v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Read v. ReadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- L'GGRKE v. ShermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. KINDLECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.