Legal Opinion
TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 16, 2014No. 111,181PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
T1 This case involves a trial court's dismissal of an action based upon its determination that the action was not brought in the forum that was specified in the attorney client written agreement. We hold that a party should utilize the 12 O.S8. § 2012(B)(6)/summary judgment procedure when that party seeks to dismiss an Oklahoma proceeding based upon an alleged contractual right of interstate venue selection. The matter is remanded to the District Court for the parties to adjudicate their respective claims by the proper procedure.
I
T2 The City of Oklahoma City charged Christopher Tucker…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- CATES v. INTEGRIS HEALTH, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- State v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Andrew v. Depani-SparkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.