Wessling v. Latkanich
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
In this an action in trespass plaintiff’s statement described his injuries as follows: “He was injured in, on, and about the back, head, and hips. The muscles, nerves, ligaments, ducts, and glands in, on, and about his eyes and the parts attached thereto and connected therewith have been seriously and permanently impaired. His shoulders, arms, hands, legs, and feet were injured. He suffered a definite injury to his right and left sacroiliac joints. His nervous system has been damaged.” On trial, plaintiff offered to prove an injury to his back related to the injuries laid…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Goldberg v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Rooney v. MacZkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Pennsylvania & New York Railroad & Canal Co. v. BunnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Wilson v. Howard Johns RestaurantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Arner v. SokolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Schwab v. P. J. Oesterling & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- BELL v. ShetromSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.