Legal Opinion

Schwab v. P. J. Oesterling & Son, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1956No. Appeal, 158PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff’s decedent, Curtis S. Schwab, died as the result of injuries received in an automobile accident two days earlier. He left to survive Mm his widowed mother whom he supported and with whom he lived on their farm. Mrs. Schwab brought suit in her own right and as administratrix c.t.a. of the estate of her deceased son against the defendant company for damages on the allegation that negligence of the defendant was responsible for the accident which resulted in her son’s injury and death.

The plaintiff averred in paragraph 8 of her complaint that, through…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Piacquadio v. Beaver Valley Service Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Coll v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Wessling v. LatkanichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Mumma v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Tulewicz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Bortner v. GladfelterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Barragan v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. BELL v. ShetromSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API