Goldberg v. Friedrich
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Plaintiff’s declaration contained averments that Louis Goldberg was a minor under the age of sixteen, in the employ of defendant, and was put to work on a certain machine used to crown bottles; that while illegally and unlawfully employed, his hand was caught in the machine, crushed, and the finger bones broken; that defendant was negligent in putting a minor under the age of sixteen to work at a dangerous occupation without explaining it to him; that the employment was in violation of various named acts of assembly, but the Child Labor Act of 1915 was not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hall v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Allen v. Tuscarora Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Krutlies v. Bulls Head Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Hogarty v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Mays v. United Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Godina v. OSWALDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Miners Savings Bank v. NaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Wilkinson v. United Parcel Service of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. Shipley Humble Oil Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.