State v. Carrizales
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
Petronilo Carrizales appeals from an order denying modification of his terms of probation. Carrizales pled no contest to one count of second-degree sexual assault and was ordered to attend counseling as a condition of probation. Carrizales contends that his Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination was violated because his sex offender treatment program required that he admit committing the sexual assault. We conclude that Carrizales's right against self-incrimination was not violated because his admission of guilt would not incriminate him in a future criminal proceeding. We therefore…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Joseph L. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Tate v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. James CranleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Turner v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.