State Ex Rel. Tate v. Schwarz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.
¶ 1. The issue in this case is whether the state may constitutionally revoke a defendant's probation because he refuses, during court-ordered sex offender treatment, and before the time for a direct appeal has expired or an appeal has been denied, to admit to the crime of which he was convicted.
¶ 2. Gary Tate was convicted of repeated sexual assault of a child after a jury trial in which he testified and denied the offense. He was placed on probation and ordered into sex offender treatment. He was required, as a part of the treatment program, to admit to the offense. He refused, asserting his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. Iowa District Court for Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Bleeke v. LemmonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- United States v. James CranleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Ardonis Greer v. Wayne J. WiedenhoeftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re Commitment of MarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.