Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tate v. Schwarz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2002No. 00-1635PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.

¶ 1. The issue in this case is whether the state may constitutionally revoke a defendant's probation because he refuses, during court-ordered sex offender treatment, and before the time for a direct appeal has expired or an appeal has been denied, to admit to the crime of which he was convicted.

¶ 2. Gary Tate was convicted of repeated sexual assault of a child after a jury trial in which he testified and denied the offense. He was placed on probation and ordered into sex offender treatment. He was required, as a part of the treatment program, to admit to the offense. He refused, asserting his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. Iowa District Court for Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. Bleeke v. LemmonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. United States v. James CranleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Ardonis Greer v. Wayne J. WiedenhoeftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In Re Commitment of MarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API