Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Meadows

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 25, 1992No. 91-1669PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

This case involves the award of an attorney fee for the collection of delinquent child support, a portion of which was owed to respondent, Judith Meadows, and the rest owed to the State of Iowa.

The State appeals a district court order that required the State to pay a portion of respondent’s private attorney fees for services in accomplishing a mandatory income assignment of the social security benefits of the obligor, Todd Meadows. The assignment benefited the State as well as Judith. We reverse.

I. Background facts and proceedings. Todd and Judith Meadows, now known…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GelineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Broadlawns Polk County Hospital Ex Rel. Fenton v. Estate of MajorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Tucker v. NasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Kirkpatrick v. PattersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Severson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. York Ins. Group of Maine v. Van HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  2. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium v. Settlement Funds Ex Rel. E.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hagge v. Iowa Department of Revenue & FinanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. York Ins. Group of Maine v. Van HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API