Legal Opinion

In Re Opinion No. 24

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 14, 1992PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

GARIBALDI, J.

The New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law (the “Committee”) concluded in Advisory Opinion No. 24, 126 N.J.L.J. 1306, 1338 (1990), that “paralegals functioning outside of the supervision of an attorney-employer are engaged in the unauthorized practice of law.” Petitioners are several independent paralégals whom attorneys do not employ but retain on a temporary basis. They ask the Court to disapprove the Advisory Opinion.

Like paralegals employed by attorneys, independent paralegals retained by attorneys do…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. New Jersey State Bar Ass'n v. New Jersey Ass'n of Realtor BoardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Cameo Convalescent Center, Inc. v. SennCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re Education Law Center, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Auerbacher v. WoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of LernerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hawkins v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HallmonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrennanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. In Re Estate of DivineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API