Auerbacher v. Wood

The opinion of tlié court was delivered by

Heher, J.

We concur in the dismissal of the bill of complaint and, generally, in the reasoning of the' learned Vice-Chancellor. There is no proof that defendant intends to engage in the practice of law in New Jersey.

Defendant simply made known, by circular and newspaper advertisement, his “availability”, to employers for “such guidance as is necessary or desirable in the use of industrial relations and collective bargaining techniques, with particular attention to immediate “needs and future requirements,” and his willingness “to collaborate with…