Legal Opinion

Basic Capital Management, Inc. v. Dynex Commercial, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2011No. 08-0244PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

This is an action for breach of a commitment to provide financing for future real estate investments. The borrowers were to be entities that would be formed to hold each investment separately as opportunities arose. We hold that the corporate owners of those entities were third-party beneficiaries of the commitment, and that consequential damages for the lender’s breach of the commitment were foreseeable. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals 1 and remand the case to that court for further consideration.

I

Basic Capital Management, Inc. managed publicly traded real estate investment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sixth RMA Partners, L.P. v. SibleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of AltonTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. First Bank v. BrumittTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Zachry Construction Corporation v. Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Reinagel v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  5. Pedro Gonzalez & Maria Gomez v. Vatr Construction LLC & All American Roofing & Construction, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API