Sixth RMA Partners, L.P. v. Sibley
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith
Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 28 permits a partnership doing business under an assumed name to file suit in that name. Tex.R. Civ. P. 28. However, before judgment, the partnership’s correct legal name must be substituted for its assumed name. The first issue in this case is whether there is legally sufficient evidence that Sixth RMA Partners, L.P. used “RMA Partners, L.P.” as an assumed riame so that the original petition filed under the name RMA Partners, L.P. was effective to commence suit on behalf of Sixth RMA Partners, L.P. The second issue is whether Sixth RMA Partners, L.P.’s second…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Roberson v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by252 opinions
- Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Shields Ltd. Partnership v. BradberryTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- CA PARTNERS v. Spears, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Texas Southern University v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.