Legal Opinion
Scharpf v. AIG Marketing, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 30, 2003No. 3:00-cv-00614PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Kathleen Scharpf has filed a ten-count complaint alleging that, in obtaining her consumer report, Defendants AIG Marketing, Inc. (“AIG”), MBNA Insurance Agency (“MBNA”), and “Unknown Persons,” violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., invaded her privacy in violation of Kentucky common law, and engaged in an unlawful civil conspiracy. 1 The centerpiece to Plaintiffs FCRA allegations has been her contention that AIG lacked a “permissible purpose” to obtain her credit report. The cross motions for summary judgment focused…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stafford v. Cross Country BankDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
- Smith v. Bob Smith Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
- Trikas v. Universal Card Services Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Lowry v. Croft (In re Croft)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- Ashby v. Farmers Group, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.