Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Fedderwitz

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1900No. Cr. No. 636PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus by George Fedderwitz against Oscar L. Rogers and another. Petition denied.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

The petitioner was convicted before Robert Edgar, claiming to be justice of the peace of the town of Berkeley, of violating an ordinance of that municipality. On appeal to the superior court the judgment of the justice’s court was affirmed, and in pursuance thereof petitioner is held in custody of the sheriff of Alameda county. He claims that his imprisonment was unlawful: First, because there is no justice’s court of the town of Berkeley; second, because the ordinance defining the offense of which he was convicted is void; and, third, because the complaint upon which he was prosecuted does…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. Boo Doo HongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Merced County v. Helm & NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Beneficial Loan Society, Ltd. v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Shipp v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.California Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. DraperAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1933
  5. People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API