Legal Opinion
People v. Draper
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided May 20, 1933No. Cr. A. No. 913PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
We are required to consider the provisions of ordinance 1971 of the city of Pasadena as applied in a complaint charging respondent with its violation. So far as pertinent to the questions raised, the ordinance, adopted in 1922, reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person ... to sell . . . any spirituous, vinous, malt or other alcoholic liquor within the city of Pasadena.” To the complaint, charging that respondent, on April 13, 1933, “did wilfully and unlawfully sell alcoholic liquor” in the city of Pasadena, she interposed a demurrer. An *Supp. 791order was made sustaining the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- In Re IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Byrne v. DrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- In re GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Santa Barbara v. EldredCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. PallaresAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1952
- People v. PallaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Los Angeles Brewing Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. AlvesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.