Legal Opinion
Avenell v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 12, 1974No. 33441PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.
Defendant, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, manufactured and sold a turbine generator to Toledo Edison Company. The turbine generator was delivered to Toledo Edison Company and installed at its Bay Shore power generating station near Toledo in May of 1968.
On August 10, 1971, plaintiffs appellants, as assignees and subrogees of Toledo Edison Company, filed suit in the Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County for $185-000 consequential damages allegedly resulting from a failure and breakage of turbine blades of the generator man ufactured and sold to Toledo Edison by Westinghouse Corporation.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Inglis v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Truck & Concrete Equipment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by32 opinions
- Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.