Carrothers v. Hunter
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeebebt, J.
The record in this case clearly shows that the giving of the charge by the trial judge, in response to the question asked by the jury, was based upon the judge’s and counsels’ belief that the law contained in the charge was correct. Kohn v. B. F. Goodrich Co. (1941), 139 Ohio St. 141, 38 N. E. 2d 592. It is undisputed that counsel for the appellee had no knowledge of the error and that he relied upon the stated conclusion of the trial judge that the Kohn case was the applicable law. Under these circumstances, appellee’s counsel informed the judge:
“I have no objection to the charge being…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LynnOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Oechsle v. HartOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. TudorOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Simko v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Kohn v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. McAlpinOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Larry Fornash v. Ronald C. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Robert Melchior v. Arnold R. JagoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.