Legal Opinion

Chesbrough v. Woodworth

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1917No. 179PublishedCited by 51 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

Action in ten counts charging plaintiff in error and one Joseph W. McGraw with violating the National Bank Act and alleging damages resulting to defendant in error therefrom.

In description of the parties we shall designate them respectively as plaintiff and defendants.

In all the counts defendant Chesbrough and McGraw are alleged to have been at certain dates directors of the Old Second National Bank, a national banking corporation organized and doing business under the National Bank Act of 1864 and the amendments thereto and having its office in the City of Bay City, Michigan.

The following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yates v. Jones National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Thomas v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Herrmann v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Jones National Bank v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Yates v. Utica BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Sylvester Marx v. Centran CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,010 Fred H. Harmsen v. C. Arnholt SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Robert H. Morast v. T. Bertram LanceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Joel R. Gaff v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API