Legal Opinion
Dutcher v. Matheson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 13, 2013No. 12-4150PublishedCited by 695 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Chief Judge.
Although this case presents significant questions regarding the interaction of federal banking and state foreclosure laws, our focus is upon a more fundamental question: whether the district court even had jurisdiction to consider the issues raised. Plaintiffs 1 filed a class-action lawsuit in state court, alleging that the defendants 2 — including ReeonTrust, a Texas-based national bank — had conducted nonjudicial foreclosure sales that did not comply with Utah law. After removal, the district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, concluding that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Smoot v. Chicago, Rock Island And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- John PAMPILLONIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RJR NABISCO, INC., Nabisco Foods Group, Planters Lifesavers Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by695 opinions
- Karen Hansen v. Group Health CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Boulder County Commissioners v. Suncor EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- De La Rosa v. Reliable, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
690 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.