Yates v. Utica Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT-OF THE'STATE OP NEBRASKA. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
These are the actions referred to in the opinion just announced in No. 230, Yates v. Jones National Bank, as companion actions with that case and as having been tried with it. The issues raised below and the questions of law which here arise for decision, are, therefore, the same as in No. 230, and the reasons given in the opinion in that case require a reversal of the judgments in these..
In the Bailey case (No. 232),. however,, there is a question not presented in the others, which, if determined in favor óf the plaintiffs in error in that case, will finally settle that particular…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- National Foundry & Pipe Works v. Oconto Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
3Cited by25 opinions
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Chesbrough v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Harmsen v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Crowson v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Keown v. KeownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.