Legal Opinion

State v. French

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 10, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Dallas District Court. — Hon. A. W. Wilkinson, Judge. Indictment for rape. V-erdict of guilty, and judgment thereon. The defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Granger, J..1 The first two propositions 'argued by the appellant are the sufficiency of the evidence to (.support the verdict, and the insufficiency of the evidence as to corroboration. The record will not permit us to consider either of1 these questions, for it , 'does- not appear that the abstract is one of all the evidence. There is no statement whatever of what the abstract contains. There is the certificate of the trial judge -as to the bill of exceptions, but that can have no reference to the abstract, which .must have been made after the bill of exceptions was completed. See Fulliam…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Fulliam v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. State v. HoganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  5. State v. KuhnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. State v. RalstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. State v. LahmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. State v. ChauvetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API