Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 4, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Slory District Gourt. — Hon. B. P. Birdsall, J udge. The defendant, having been accused and convicted of assault with intent to commit rape, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1 The evidence warranted the jury in finding that some one assaulted Bertha McVey, with the purpose of committing rape, on the morning of May 28, 1896. She identified the defendant as the guilty party. Ho insists, however, that she is not corroborated by other evidence tending to connect him with the commission of the offense. The statute does not fix the quantum, or kind of evidence required, nor is its sufficiency to be determined by excluding the evidence of the injured party. State v. McLaughlin, 44 Iowa, 85. If, considered in connection therewith, the other evidence tends to identify and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. State v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. State v. RalstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. State v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. State v. LahmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Brooks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API